This entry was posted on 30 May 2012 at 12:14 am and is filed under Undated marks, Gone. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
This mark is now mostly gone. The concrete at the lower portion has been ground down, presumably to smooth the transition to the next paving square. All that remains is “JAY” and (barely) what looks to be the very top of the “T” in “HOLT”. I would never have figured out who this was until I saw the photos of these marks on your site.
The beveling program that grinds off so many marks is important for pedestrian safety. . . . Fortunately there are lots more Jay Holt marks around town.
Yes, no question that the grinding program is much needed for safety, and of course it’s inevitable that old contractor marks will disappear for one reason or another. I hadn’t seen any Jay Holt marks before but it’s a nice-looking one and I’ll have to check out that on on 102nd Ave. next time I’m out that way. Thanks!
26 October 2022 at 3:20 pm
This mark is now mostly gone. The concrete at the lower portion has been ground down, presumably to smooth the transition to the next paving square. All that remains is “JAY” and (barely) what looks to be the very top of the “T” in “HOLT”. I would never have figured out who this was until I saw the photos of these marks on your site.
26 October 2022 at 5:01 pm
The beveling program that grinds off so many marks is important for pedestrian safety. . . . Fortunately there are lots more Jay Holt marks around town.
26 October 2022 at 5:56 pm
Yes, no question that the grinding program is much needed for safety, and of course it’s inevitable that old contractor marks will disappear for one reason or another. I hadn’t seen any Jay Holt marks before but it’s a nice-looking one and I’ll have to check out that on on 102nd Ave. next time I’m out that way. Thanks!