This one makes me happy in a confused way, pushing this version of the Fitzmaurice mark (version III) back three years. As far as I can tell, this was used entirely within the period that version II was used.
This entry was posted on 2 March 2013 at 12:04 am and is filed under 1928. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
Leave a comment